• Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I wish it was true here. Major releases are always the most shameful ones because so much is always left to “we can fix that later”

  • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I use CalVer in my projects. I might transition to SemVer some time, but given that most of my projects are standalone, it doesn’t make much sense to track external compatibility.

    Pride Versioning makes no sense, because In never quite proud enough of my work to distinguish it from 0ver.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    I once had someone open an issue in my side project repo who asked about a major release bump and whether it meant there were any breaking changes or major changes and I was just like idk I just thought I added enough and felt like bumping the major version ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think is the logic used for Linux kernel versioning so you’re in good company.

      But everyone should really follow semantic versioning. It makes life so much easier.