Isn’t this GPL license violation? GPL clearly states that the license must be preserved

I can also understand it as a temporatory solution. I understand that Linus wouldn’t want to see his product used by russians commiting war crimes. They can still contribute to linux apps, only the kernel is prohibited. But i think if the situation gets better, russians should be allowed to contribute again. But i got much more upset on that people call Mozilla woke for its moderation efforts to combat hate speech aimed on marginalized groups. War criminals and the far-right has no place in any open-source community, as the concept itself is closer to the left wing by nature. I might be a bit unpopular with this, these are controversial stuff

Most modern androids enforce it btw

Yes, android is actually a very secure system if you get rid of the vendor rom and google

He is not the type of developer who would allow it

Only because they use Linux too and had to make it public as Linux is a public, open-source kernel

Thats’s intresting. I only use linux as vms, or on ny android Termux interface, since 4 months and i could install arch with archinstall and nowadays i’m almost done it without archinstall. I will also plan to write my own “bootloader” if grub and systemd-boot acts up, which grub did. I also wrote this script that creates a log file from your open ports using nmap and saves it with the current date:

clear ; pkg install nmap && sudo nmap -O 127.0.0.1 >> “log$(date +%Y%m%d-%H).txt” && echo “/n/nlog file saved to $(pwd)/log$(date +%Y%m%d-%H).txt” ; nano “log$(date +%Y%m%d-%H).txt”

Graphene unofficial builds are aviable for a few more devices

InfinityXOS released its Android 15 version already in November

these are not real people, just bots

Linux can be configured to have much better security, even by someone knowing a little about computers due to its open-source nature. And it is especially true to my case, since i’m an IT student Can you change to a hardened kernel on Windows? I use Helios kernel even on my android, which is designed to be more secure than the stock one. And there are distros which come preconfigured for security. Not much skill is needed to have a secure Linux system. But you can be a highly proficient sysadmin on Windows, but you will still depend on a few thousand Microsoft employees to fix your system. On Linux, there are millions of people and various corporations are actively working to make it secure, and even you could, if you are really highly skilled. For someone who doesn’t know what a pendrive is, yes, Windows might be more secure than something like Ubuntu or any basic distro (and they propably can’t use anything more advanced and secure by design).

But it doesn’t take much skill to choose a highly secure linux distro, like Bazzite, Garuda, or even Qubes and use it, or maybe even harden your own. Android, which is also based on Linux is not secure by default, but in the hands of the right person, it can be a suprisingly secure system

you are just exploiting my words. I never said Linux will protect me whatever happens. But it will have a better protection inherently, than any windows

there are much less vulrenabilities on Linux. No system is totally unpenetrable, but having 2-5 vulrebabilities is always better than having 30-40

on RedStarOS, sudo reports to Kim Jong Un