Laurel Raven

Let’s be real, though, it’s not the dev we should be mad at but some suit who thinks they know security demanding it be done that way

Fully agreed

Huh, I think I didn’t know (or just forgot) that it was panned… I liked it, it was fun

You… You are aware just how much tech and effects have progressed in the last sixty years… Right? What they were doing was groundbreaking for the time, pretty much every time.

Funny thing, I didn’t even really notice the lense flares until people started complaining about it… I guess when you live with something like that all the time (thanks, astigmatism), seeing it on screen just doesn’t have the same effect on you

Why wouldn’t they be allowed to use it?

Computers have room for multiple ports and is where a new standard would crop up anyway even without the law, just like where USB-C started out.

Sued for following the law and making sure the required connector is present and functional? Unless I’m missing something, the law doesn’t require the port be exclusive. I mean, if it did, they’d have to stop including wireless charging, and I don’t see that happening.

[…] have to be equipped with […]

That does not mean only equipped with