• indog@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    From a consumer’s point of view, does it matter if the exclusive is de facto or de jure? If I have no choice but to do business with Valve and Steam to play a game on PC, it seems to me that that game is a Steam exclusive. And there are thousands of Steam exclusives, but only a handful of Epic exclusives.

    • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      It doesn’t seem like you’re paying attention… Steam didn’t buy the publisher of a popular game, and have it removed from the Epic game store so that it could be their exclusive. That was Epic and the game was rocket league. If epic wanted to compete “from a consumer’s point of view” they would make a better product than steam, but their store is still missing features

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        If epic wanted to compete “from a consumer’s point of view” they would make a better product than steam, but their store is still missing features

        Reminder that it took them 2 fucking years to implement a shopping cart

        • indog@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I mean this isn’t ideal, but you can understand why they might make that a lower priority. Probably 90% of my gaming purchases are for 1 item.

          And I find it hard to believe that you anti Epic people are arguing in good faith when your first complaint is that you can’t more easily buy multiple games on a platform you seem to dislike so much.