• woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Shit I really like GOG as it’s the only competition to steam

      There are plenty of competing PC game online stores, it’s just that they all suck monkey balls when you’re not using Windows. Microsoft is currently using their old monopolist playbook and release Blizzard games to the fucking Microsoft Store and Game Pass and not a single 3rd party store.

      And don’t forget that the other publisher-owned storefronts like EA’s and Ubisoft’s are also still alive. They suck hard but they exist and apparently they do well enough to continue to be around.

      Steam is the only PC games store that fights Microsoft’s Windows monopoly. GOG Galaxy has been written using the Qt framework. Making a Linux version of an existing Qt application is relatively easy (at least compared to a full port). Do that, integrate umu-Launcher for Windows games, bundle everything up and release GOG Galaxy on Flathub. Boom, done. But they don’t do that despite their massive pile of Witcher and Cyberpunk money.

      So plenty of competition exists but if you happen to not be Windows-exclusive, everyone but Steam is bad.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I mean, the Epic Store exists. Well, not on Linux. And it’s missing a lot of features the other storefronts have.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          So, they’re both out to fuck everyone, and just playing for different teams?

        • TheEntity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Not nearly the same degree. GOG sells actual Linux games with no 3rd party software necessary to play them. The same cannot be said about EGS, one simply cannot launch an EGS game in an officially supported way.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            For a very limited subset of games, they provide linux binaries. For the rest? You are up a creek and in the realm of “Figure it out”. Which… is generally the Heroic Launcher (or Lutris for a subset) which puts you in the same boat as Epic.

            If you insist upon saying one store is more virtuous than the other… okay? I personally don’t like defending companies but you do you.

            But for the vast majority of games? Epic and GoG are in the same category as basically everything but Steam. And both are in the exact same category regarding launchers and download services since they both heavily rely on the Heroic Launcher (which is awesome).

            And, to be clear, neither should be applauded for Linux support.


            Well, to be clearer. The folk behind the Heroic Launcher (and Lutris) SHOULD be applauded. And I think there is actually a very strong argument that store fronts should not be expected to build out entire social media ecosystems with attached updaters (what launchers basically are). But both Epic and GoG have decided to half ass that so they should be called out for not doing it “right”.

            • TheEntity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              If you insist upon saying one store is more virtuous than the other… okay? I personally don’t like defending companies but you do you.

              Could you please not put words into my mouth? Neither is “virtuous” and I am not defending them. Let’s stick to the facts instead. It’s clear that EGS is being actively hostile towards Linux, while GOG is merely negligent. EGS actively removed Linux support from previously supported games on at least one occasion (Rocket League).

              • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                You’re doing it again.

                As a publisher: Yes, Epic stopped the Rocket League devs from continuing to build Linux binaries. To my knowledge, they have not disabled “support” for Proton in any of the anti-cheat solutions.

                Similarly, the development branch of CD Projekt (the parent company of GoG), apparently had Linux binaries for The Witcher 2. They do not for The Witcher 3 or Cyberpunk.

                Both companies decided it was not worth internally supporting Linux and instead rely on Proton/Wine to do it for them. Whether that is good for gaming is debatable, but both are “actively hostile towards Linux” in that regard.


                If you do want to criticize the handling of Linux then I would suggest looking into the Unreal Engine marketplace (or whatever they call it now) being a complete shitshow for Linux developers. Which is ironic since the UE documentation is actually great for Linux devs. I cannot speak to the CDPR efforts with their modding SDKs since I haven’t opened one since The Witcher 1 (when it was either a hacked version of the NWN toolkit or an officially hacked version of the NWN toolkit).

                But that is Epic and CDP not EGS and GoG.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yes yes, bitch eating crackers and all that.

            But can we maybe focus on what they actually are shit at (which is a lot) rather than manufacturing virtue for other companies?