Why don’t we use “express” as an attribute modifier?

This girl sexy express 😏

Depends on whether they’re sitting on the floor, doesn’t it?

And it’s the most generic boring non-specific review imaginable. Any Markov chain would generate better results.

Do you have more recent information by Signal on the topic? The GitHub issue you linked is actually concerned with publicly hosting APKs. They also seem to have been offering reproducible builds for a good while, though it’s currently broken according to a recent issue.

I don’t care what Google wants. Maybe a search engine shouldn’t be competing using vertically integrated services? Or would you defend them when they remove links to non-Youtube-video platforms, and anything else that competes with their products?

We don’t have to sacrifice healthy competition and functioning services to the wants of corporations.

But I thought the movie only has a similar plot to this 1967 movie, which only featured interracial marriage in a positive light. Does it actually focus on interracial marriage? Because so far nobody has mentioned anything objectable.

No problem! Not a very common word to come across in daily life :)

Heracles is pronounced like /ˈhɛrəkliːz/ HERR-ə-kleez

I choose to pronounce testicles like Heracles.

Why are you bringing this up like it hasn’t been discussed thousands of times? Like it hasn’t been stated (and cleared) in this very post?

If David is still in one piece, who are the tens of thousands that Goliath has murdered?

And he’s far less green

Ah, so you just choose to ignore information you don’t already know? What a rational thing to do. You’re not anti-intellectual at all.

Or are you seriously trying to gaslight everyone into believing Shannon entropy doesn’t exist?

Maybe try looking into the topic instead of confidently repeating your wrong assertions? You’re literally pulling a “my hand is not a number!” right now.

Just because you have a limited understanding of a unit, doesn’t mean that unit is only applicable to what you know. Literally the star example I brought up.

You say “we don’t think in bits because our brains function nothing like computers”, but bits aren’t strictly related to computers. Bits are about information. And since our brains are machines that process information, bits are also applicable to those processes.

To show this, I chose an analogy. We say that people have 10 fingers, yet our hands have nothing to do with numbers. That’s because the concept of “10” is applicable both to math and topics that math can describe, just like “bits” are applicable both to information theory and topics that information theory can describe.

For the record: I didn’t downvote you, it was a fair question to ask.

I also thought about a better analogy - imagine someone tells you they measured the temperature of a distant star, and you say “that’s stupid, you can’t get a thermometer to a star and read the measurement, you’d die”, just because you don’t know how one could measure it.

I also don’t have 10 fingers. That doesn’t make any sense - my hands are not numbers!

Ooooor “bits” has a meaning beyond what you assume, but it’s probably just science that’s stupid.