mechoman444

I think this person means masturbation. Which doesn’t work, there is far, far better advice here than waxing the dolphin.

People will probably think I’m the most moderate right winger ever. But I’m really not. I just have hard opinions on things.

Gambling is generally a regional thing and is subject to each state. Usually it’s governed by where you are currently.

Cruise ships on the other hand are governed by the country the ship is registered in and/or by whatever country they’re docked at.

So a law will state specifically that there is no private gambling allowed within the confines of a certain geographical area such as the state of Washington, for example. The law can also make provisions that gambling is allowed on Indian reservations or within certain city limits.

The cruise ship leaves the geographical area where gambling is not allowed and allows gambling to occur in international waters which is fully law-abiding.

Also, most states and governments will provide licensing for casinos. If you qualify you may proceed with gambling in that jurisdiction.

I’m sure you will address each and every one of these fallacies correct?

1. Hasty Generalization: The argument assumes that most or all people in the U.S. are “uneducated, fat, and dangerous,” without providing sufficient evidence or accounting for the diversity of the population.

2. Ad Hominem: The criticism targets individuals based on personal attributes or perceived character flaws (“fat,” “uneducated”) rather than addressing systemic or factual issues.

3. Straw Man: The argument oversimplifies and exaggerates the actions of voters or the qualities of the elected individual, constructing a distorted view of their intentions or rationale.

4. Slippery Slope: By claiming that the U.S.'s level of “uneducation” is a threat to the entire species, the argument leaps to a catastrophic conclusion without sufficient reasoning.

5. False Dilemma: It suggests that the outcome of the election leaves no room for nuance, implying that all Americans are complicit and deserving of the system without considering other factors such as political constraints, voter suppression, or dissenting voters.

They did bring back the 5 dollar meal though, at least in my region. Which immediately makes them a viable option.

But the five dollar meal is weird in comparison to everything else they offer.

For example, a small fries by itself is $2.50 half the cost of the whole 5 dollar meal.

To me this indicates that they’re just arbitrarily increasing prices for the sake of them being more expensive.

The problem of course with raising prices at McDonald’s is that people eat there because they’re supposed to be cheap and fast. Not because of their “gourmet” food.

I am going to trust AI since it’s arguments and conclusions are generally correct.

Why would I trust you.

To be fair. I have 30+ in the healthcare industry as well. Since I have more experience you should trust and agree with anything I say on the subject.

To be more fair nothing you’ve said about healthcare thus far has been correct in any way.

And they’re been talking about death panels since Obama took office in 2008. It’s a bunch of bullshit.

Just ran your bullshit through gpt. Generally I agree with it’s assessment. Be better doofis

The text presents a claim that universal healthcare systems in the UK and EU rely on the profitability of the US private healthcare system. It argues that healthcare companies offer discounts to UK/EU markets, subsidized by higher payments from US patients, and implies that a shift to public healthcare in the US could destabilize funding models in other countries. Let us examine the key claims:

1. US Private Healthcare Subsidizing Universal Systems:

Argument: The claim relies on the idea that pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers profit heavily in the US, which enables them to sell services and products at lower costs elsewhere.

Analysis: There is some merit to this argument, as the US often pays higher prices for drugs and treatments, which can offset costs in other markets. However, this relationship is not the sole factor enabling universal healthcare in other nations. Structural efficiencies, budget allocation, and lower administrative costs also contribute significantly to the success of universal healthcare systems.

2. Impact of US Transitioning to Public Healthcare:

Argument: The text suggests that if US healthcare transitioned to a public model, profits would decrease, affecting the affordability of healthcare in other countries.

Analysis: While a reduction in US profits could impact global pricing strategies for pharmaceutical companies, universal healthcare systems are primarily funded by taxation and national budgets, not by discounts from US profits. The claim oversimplifies the economic dynamics of healthcare funding.

3. NHS Considering Pay-to-Play Models:

Argument: It asserts that the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) is exploring pay-to-play models due to funding shortages.

Analysis: The NHS has faced financial strain for years, but this is due to domestic issues like underfunding, rising demand, and political choices rather than reliance on US healthcare structures. Any pay-to-play discussions are likely localized responses rather than a reflection of systemic dependence on the US model.

Conclusion: The argument in the text exaggerates the dependence of universal healthcare systems on US private healthcare. While there are interconnections in global healthcare markets, the primary factors enabling universal systems are taxation, public funding, and policy priorities. This analysis suggests the text is reductionist and lacks nuanced consideration of how universal healthcare systems function.

O. Right. And I’m sure your country of residence is squeaky clean. No corruption at all right?

It’s actually really super simple. You would be subject to the laws of the country you reside in or are a citizen of.

Laws don’t magically stop working just because you’re out of jurisdiction.

There’s also, admiralty law, Maritime law and international law, all of which have courts in designated countries. These laws are usually governed by treaty amongst many countries.

Half life 3 confirmed.

Parasite.

It was a bad movie with no clear theme or message. It felt like it didn’t know what it wanted to be comedy drama, thriller or horror.

I felt like shit walking out of the theater.

In the Bible he is beyond human emotions. Even though he is portrayed as having human emotions in many instances such as in the garden of Eden or Job.

It’s a contradiction of course as the Bible is caulk full of them.

Remember the Bible was written by humans who cannot fathom the mind of such a character as God. At least in the Bible. So they imbue him with the emotions they feel themselves not knowing any better and hoping the illiterate masses will simply believe the scripture wholesale. Which they did and do.