deleted by creator

deleted by creator

That’s awful, I’m sorry. Have you found a spiciness substitute that lets you try heat in food without the allergic reaction? Do you know what the compound is that you react to?

deleted by creator

the uncommon thing is uncommon because that’s how it became uncommon

OK but that’s why OP asked for examples in the first place.

deleted by creator

Aristotle would have at least taken a whack at it.

Nice! I’ve wanted a tool exactly like that many times. I’ll back it and see.

The closest I could find before were essentially pin to pin continuity checkers, which are useful for telling if a cable is PD only, 2.0 vs 3.x, or has a line break, but most of those can be eyeballed, otherwise metered. So these just checkers just add precision and speed to something you already know how to do.

The runner ups were the (now ubiquitous) inline inductive energy trackers, because they can tell you a bit more about the gauge of the wires in the cable which can be important, especially high amperage 5v like pi 4.B

But to test quality of shielding for high rate data transfer, DP and PCI-E tunneling, etc., the only option was manually user testing with adequately powerful devices.

deleted by creator

you could at least

Note: here “it would be nice if” is more polite, since the least one could have done is always

deleted by creator

And then what happened?
That must be really hard for you.
Wow. You don’t deserve that.
How do you feel about it now?
Ugh. That sounds awful.
You’re handling this better than I would.
How do you even respond to that?
Tell me about it.
What can I do to help?
You’ve got this, but I’m here.

Edit: I wrote the above to illustrate how many options there are in the parlance of active listening. The formula is simple: imagine how they feel and join their side or, if you can’t yet imagine, ask questions until you can. That’s it.