One might assume they aren’t, since they asked someone to clarify. How nice of you to laugh at them instead of answering the question.

You are only able to specifically control the actions of the named target, but their death can involve another person.

Ie you can say “so and so gets hit by a bus” and a random bus nearby will hit them, but you cannot say “so and so is killed by such and such” and have the second person kill the first. I believe both people die of a heart attack if you try.

This depends on how the death note page works specifically but having to write it down all at once might be a necessary part of how it would work.

Former Death Note nerd here, this isn’t an issue, there are several points where names are written out letter by letter or left unfinished to complete later

I get what you were going for, but I think it didn’t land because turntables don’t use CDs, haha.

Haha and then they freak out and hurt or kill OP lmao that’d be hilarious and epic guys.

I do see your angle, and agree it can be interpreted this way, but I’m not sure I’m convinced this was intentional, or that a significant number of people had the same take away. If Cameron had the Patriot Act in mind (which he certainly could have), I feel it’s more likely that he made a weak attempt at showing us that it’s bad to use such power, rather than a veiled attempt to say “but sometimes it’s ok”.

To each their own though! Thank you for sharing this perspective.

The Patriot Act is used to catch the Joker

Wasn’t the entire message behind that arc “nobody should weild this power” and that’s why they destroyed it…?

Interesting! Any idea if it’s uncommon or anything? From what I’d read (which is admittedly not a lot), 95 is when they’d switched to OBDII, but maybe they made the change in the middle of the production cycle?

If I’m not mistaken, the 94 is also the only year to have the 1.8 but still using OBD rather than OBDII, which supposedly makes it easier to slap a turbo in.

Preferring the slower version is wild, haha. I’ll be moving from a VQ platform so losing ~200HP is going to be an adjustment.

1994 Miata

I wrecked my car recently and this might be the new one if I can’t fix it. Did you get a 94 for the reasons I think you got a 94?

Marker will look good for now, but in a couple of weeks it will probably be fairly noticeable again if you’re doing it straight on wood.

If you want it to look good. Sand down the area inside and directly around the chip so that it’s smooth. Brush on a layer of white primer, let it dry for a day, then layer on some paint in whatever color and finish of the guitar. Maybe some sealer if you want but if it’s just a chip I don’t think it’s necessary.

It sounds like a lot of work but it’s maybe an hour or two of actually doing anything, and for a thousand dollar guitar I’d say it’s worth it. I like projects like this, though, maybe you’re ok with the slightly faded Sharpie. I would still smooth the area out with some light sanding first, though.

I’ve never really understood why people specifically avoid buying products with RGB lighting. You can usually just set it to a color you like, or simply turn them off. Instead people don’t buy the thing they want because of the “obnoxious RGB”. Imo it’s like not wanting to buy a nice speaker because when you tried it at the store the volume was too high or you didn’t like the sample track it played.

They aren’t challenging the metaphor at all with their statement. They’re showing you that the entire premise is garbage, because within your metaphor, “Abolish the fire in my house” ≠ “Put out that one fire in my house”.

The metaphor is… Ok, I guess, if not a gross oversimplification, but your post and energy in the comments just scream “debate me bro” when it doesn’t seem like you’ve got the maturity for even a normal conversation. Like you maybe just found your first Ben Shapiro video or something.

I think a big flaw in your thinking is that you aren’t considering that we still have all the people currently living to take into consideration. We wouldn’t be instantly reduced to a tiny population that is easy to restructure and organize, there’s still like 8b people on the planet, and none of the ones in charge are going to just say, “oh, well I guess none of this matters anymore, let’s focus on sustainability”.

It would take a couple years for us to see a significant decrease in population, and all the while, those currently in power would remain in power. We wouldn’t suddenly drop to a few thousand like minded individuals, all ready to work together to rebuild. We’d be a declining population that is scared and clueless how to save itself, making mistake after mistake.