They’re saying .world is anti-china.

I’m sure your stocks will be fine.

Um… no, I don’t think so.

The problem authoritarians have is that they’re just not that popular, so to be relevant at all, they must cloak their ideas in the language of the progressive. They must pretend to be something they’re not.

I mean, I’m not saying being very strongly opinionated doesn’t lead to some authoritative rule-whipping, but I wouldn’t call that Authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is more like narcissist behavior.

Somebody has to hold the bag. I don’t think this is functionally different.

Then they may as well say they did it “with computers.”
Oh, but that’s not sexy, is it.

when we’re in the midst of another bull run.

Oh, that’s nice. So, who’s money are you rug pulling?

a rite of passage for your work to become so liked by others that they take your ideas,

ChatGPT is not a person.

People learn from the works they see […] and that is what AI does as well.

ChatGPT is not a person.

It’s actually really easy: we can say that chatgpt, which is not a person, is also not an artist, and thus cannot make art.

The mathematical trick of putting real images into a blender and then outputting a Legally Distinct™ one does not absolve the system of its source material.

but are instead weaving it into their process to the point it is not even clear AI was used at the end.

The only examples of AI in media that I like are ones that make it painfully obvious what they’re doing.

Yeah, it’s a lot like piss in a river. I just drink around the piss.