• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a good thing.

    Let people say what they want. If you don’t like it, you can always ignore them.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m half with you. You can say what you want, but if you harass people, regardless of the content of your speech, you should be banned/silenced on private platforms.

    • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You are a mentally deranged paedophile that wants to mutilate children.

      Just ignore me while I tell everyone I know about that paedophile john89, okay?

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It also strives in the world of censorship, it just serves the dominant force then.

    • halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see what you’re getting at - if we’re gonna allow our citizens freedom of speech, this is part of what it looks like. For the record, these dumb ass takes on my LGBTQ+ peeps do NOT align with my own personal feelings. However, freedom of speech is objectively a good thing.

      Problem is that entities like Meta and X are suppressing the voices of people that are making comments against the status quo and challenging the uber rich, and elevating the voices of the bigots.

      All that to say I think that’s why people are downvoting you, but I agree with you.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        As a libertarian, I love the saying, “your rights end where mine begin.” You can say whatever you like, up until the point where it starts violating my rights. Harassment violates my rights, and if you harass me with your speech, regardless of the actual content, you should be silenced on that platform.

        The way I see it, harassment has two parts to it:

        • damages
        • intent

        If I offend on accident, I should have the opportunity to make it right. If I offend on purpose, I should be banned.

    • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hard disagree.

      If one person’s rights negatively affect another persons rights you can’t just rule one right to be more important in every situation. There’s gotta be more nuance than that.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can say whatever you want without affecting other people’s rights.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        How does writing a comment on Facebook negatively affect anyone’s rights?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Speech on Facebook/Instagram/etc can constitute harassment, which is a rights violation. That said, harassment has two parts to it:

          • actual harm to receiver
          • intended harm by the speaker

          The second is harder to prove, but fortunately social media has a lot of samples to pick from to demonstrate a pattern.