• YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Because it’s about sending a message. They’ve seen how popular this guy and his actions have become and are trying to throw everything at him so it puts off any copycats.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Death penalty increases violence because murdering the person catching you becomes a way to increase your likelihood of surviving.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          So basically, killing Luigi would not make copycats less likely, but it WOULD make it more likely for copycats to shoot CEOs AND cops?

          Hmm… The killing of Luigi itself would be awful, of course, but the consequences of it sound like a win to me 🤔

        • rickdg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Death penalty backfires because it demonstrates fear for what this person keeps saying.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            That would make him a martyr. I’m thinking the plan is to lock him up in max for life, then control the media narrative whenever his name comes up again.

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              Everyone who saw how this thing went down gonna have to spend their lives correcting false narratives they will weave.

              We didn’t do know for snowden, public opinion got split altht funny enough it seems people have came around on Snowden.

              Either way, luigi did not do anything wrong

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      The death penalty has not been executed in NY/federal court for decades right? Doesn’t seem like an actual threat. What they want to achieve is a good negotiating position for a plea bargain because they known a trial will be a shitshow.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    “because their lives don’t matter as much as CEOs”

    This is the defining moment. This is our future

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Protests within US are limited to major cities otherwise logistics are fucked due to suburb lay out of the most of the country.

      Also, most of are just too docile, it ain’t an issue I til they personally get fucked.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        That’s their point: America never does anything. People love to act like they stand for something, but cower at the slightest consequence or inconvenience.

    • Maiq@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      We have the Russian “and then it got worse” do nothing attitude. We aren’t even gonna try to do anything till its far too late.

    • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      When we have protests large enough to get noticed, we get attacked by the police. Why should the protesters have to suffer? Make the oppressors suffer instead.

  • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Yes there are double standards but this is the wrong comparison to make that point.

    Most school shooters are minors who are inelligible for the death penalty, and a large percentage don’t survive their own shooting. Either death by cop or suicide.

    I have no love for insurance CEOs or our capital-first justice system, but if you’re gonna make a point don’t leave it open to be so easily picked apart.

  • sndmn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Good luck finding a jury to convict him of jaywalking.

    Some homicides are self defence.

      • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Vigilante justice only feels nice when you agree with the Vigilante. The curse of internet bubbles is that people feel like everyone agrees. Bubbles build extreme values and a lack of understanding of other peoples values.

        You become right. Others become bootlickers.

    • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      For that very reason… He will never see a jury. This will be decided by ONE judge…

      Who has already written his poinion

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        6th amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial. The only way he doesn’t see a jury is if he waives that right.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Land of Double Standards.

    Pulling an excerpt from George Carlin: “Politicians hide behind three things in this country: The Flag, The Bible and Children. No child left behind! It wasn’t long ago you were talking about giving children a headstart. Headstart, Left Behind. Someone’s losing fucking ground here.”

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The state of New York is about to get a firsthand lesson in the Streisand Effect. They should have just charged him the same charge any normal killer would get - Second Degree Murder, which is the normal charge for premeditated murder in NY. First degree requires rare special circumstances, and the prosecutor chose to use a dubious “terrorism” modifier to up the charge to Murder 1. They just couldn’t help themselves, and they shot themselves in the foot.

    The advantage to the prosecution to a simple Murder 2 charge is that motive really doesn’t matter much. They just have to prove that Luigi pulled the trigger. But with the terrorism modifier, the trial will no devolve into lengthy discussions about his motives and message. Not only have they now given him the world’s largest soapbox, but this will also give the defense an opportunity to make him much more sympathetic to the jury. With only a Murder 2 charge, the defense lawyer would have had to fight hard to sneak subtle hints into trial about Luigi’s motives. Now his motives will be a core part of the prosecution’s case.

    With a simple Murder 2 trial, even jurors who thought Thompson got what he deserved could vote to convict based simply on the letter of the law. Luigi killed an evil man, but he still has to face the consequences like any other criminal. Now the jury will clearly see that the system isn’t treating him like any other criminal. The prosecutors, through their own actions, are making Luigi’s case for him - the justice system is completely rigged in favor of the rich and powerful, and the only way they can ever be held accountable is through violence.

    All it takes is one juror of twelve to look around at the situation and say, “this is bullshit. I’m not going to convict.” Sure, they can try him again with a new jury if he’s not found unanimously not-guilty, but that jury will have an even greater risk of jury nullification. The longer this goes on, the more likely the prosecutor just has to offer him some sweetheart plea deal just to get him convicted of something. And each trial just elevates Mangione that much closer to literal Sainthood in the popular imagination.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I do believe it would be a tactical error on their part to give him the death penalty… make a real martyr

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Hahaha yah right. If they kill him there we’ll be massive bitching online and that’s about it.

        • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I had the same thought. Us North Americans are not used to sacrificing ourselves for the betterment of the future generations.

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    My personal tinfoil hat is that they are seeking the death penalty so he accepts a deal. They are scared of jury nullification.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      That isn’t tinfoil-hat at all. I was reading a news story recently about how worried they are that they’ll have trouble finding impartial jurors, since there’s so much sympathy for him.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        How exactly does this work? How do they determine someone to be impartial? If they weed out people for having sympathy but keep people who don’t, aren’t they making that jury partial to finding him guilty?

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          The jury is supposed to be unbiased, i.e. not favoring one side or the other. Obviously, it’s impossible to get a jury that’s completely impartial, especially in a case that’s as high-profile as this one, but they have to try.

          They ask the jurors questions and then each side has the opportunity to remove ones that they deem problematic.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      That’s how they’re justifying the federal charges, because he went from one state to the next, and he used the internet.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    An interesting factoid. In Finnish language “väkivalta” means violence. It is a combination word:

    väki = people, crowd, folk

    valta = power, reign

    • dogsoahC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      So… in Finland “democracy” and “violence” are the same thing? xD